Accepts that aversive management and dangerous coaching practices, each authorized and unlawful, exist in society and it seeks to scale back its hurt fairly than simply dismiss or condemn it.
Views how individuals view, and prepare or modify behaviors of their animals as multi-faceted, and sophisticated, with a variety of approaches from what some may name drive free, all the best way right down to utilizing coercion and drive, whereas additionally acknowledging that some approaches are safer and fewer dangerous for animals.
Prioritizes enhancing particular person animal and proprietor and neighborhood wellbeing over insisting on whole abstinence from utilizing aversive management because the measure of profitable intervention.
Advocates for non judgmental, non coercive help providers to assist people and communities to scale back the harms of forceful animal coaching.
Entails individuals with lived pet proprietor experiences in creating packages and insurance policies that affect them straight.
Acknowledges that individuals who use dangerous coaching practices are main brokers in hurt discount and it empowers them to share the data and help that they get with others.
Acknowledges how elements comparable to individuals’s lived experiences, social inequalities, and trauma may have an effect on each their vulnerability to and administration of dangerous coaching practices.
Doesn’t ignore the very actual dangers and tragedies related to dangerous coaching practices, aiming to handle them straight.
