A dispute over the return of a deposit when the sale of a pony fell by may have been prevented had a contract been in place, a choose has dominated.
In June 2022, Theresa Bearman agreed to purchase 138cm showjumper Letterkeen Bettyn from Raquel Eldridge-Keenan for £85,000. Mrs Bearman paid a £21,500 deposit stating that she would “pay the remaining following a vetting” – and a message from Ms Eldridge-Keenan mentioned that if the horse “breaks a leg and so forth, I’ll refund all of it.”
It was agreed that “Betty” would transfer to her new residence on the finish of October, after she jumped on the Horse of the Yr Present. However on 12 October, days after the competitors, a vet deserted the pre-purchase examination when it was deemed in the course of the examination that Betty was lame. Mrs Bearman mentioned she wouldn’t go forward with the acquisition and requested for her deposit again. However Mrs Eldridge-Keenan mentioned the cash had been “a holding deposit”.
In a courtroom listening to on 20 March 2024, the choose dominated that “the vetting was unsuccessful and Mrs Bearman was entitled to deal with the contract as discharged and is entitled to the return of the cash she paid by means of deposit”.
Betty returned to profitable competitors quickly after the vetting, and the choose mentioned her success “earlier than and after the vetting speaks for itself” – however that this was not the problem of the case.
“This unlucky and costly case ought to by no means have arisen,” he mentioned, including that he inspired consumers and sellers to make use of normal contracts in non-public gross sales.
“It is not going to resolve each dispute, however it will go an extended method to making the rights and obligations clearer for all concerned.”
Jacqui Darkish of Equine Legislation UK, who represented Mrs Bearman, advised H&H that her shopper hopes her case will elevate consciousness on the significance of contracts.
“Loads of this was primarily based on belief, and sadly that’s the place this stuff all the time finish in litigation, as a result of you don’t have anything in writing, you’re counting on textual content messages, and it simply will get actually messy,” she mentioned.
A consultant for Mrs Eldridge-Keenan advised H&H that Betty has continued to carry out and this was the premise “for which we imagine we had been justified”.
“Finally a choose had a distinct opinion, and we respect the authorized system, however we don’t essentially agree with the judgement and we don’t assume we’re essentially incorrect. The continued efficiency of the horse is testomony of its wellness,” the consultant mentioned, however agreed that had there been a contract, there would “have been no query or interpretation”.
Ms Darkish mentioned she has obtained “an increasing number of” calls about deposit disputes up to now 5 years – and that these will be avoidable with contracts. She recommends that these set out phrases round deposits; whether or not they’re refundable and on what foundation, signed by each events and dates.
Oonagh Meyer, British Horse Society head of operations for authorized centres, mentioned shopping for a horse will be thrilling however to get probably the most “constructive final result for you, the vendor and the horse, it’s necessary to make cautious concerns all through the buying course of” – and that house owners ought to have signed receipts for cash and take into account a gross sales contract, together with preparations for deposits.
You may also be excited by:
Credit score: Horse & Hound Inventory Archive
Credit score: ANDREW SYDENHAM
Credit score: Future
