22.6 C
New York
Monday, May 20, 2024

Pink algae reduces methane emissions from cow poop


Earth has a cow downside. Cow agriculture is without doubt one of the largest emitters of climate-warming methane to the ambiance.

However including a kind of purple algae recognized for its methane-inhibiting properties to cow feces would possibly assist. Doing so reduces the manufacturing of methane inside feces by about 44 p.c, researchers report July 13 in Frontiers in Sustainable Meals Techniques. That provides a promising new avenue to scale back general methane emissions from cattle, the scientists say.

Cow agriculture is liable for almost 1 / 4 of the world’s emissions of methane, a potent greenhouse fuel (SN: 11/18/15; SN: 5/5/22). The cows make methane of their guts throughout digestion that’s then launched to the world, principally through burps. A smaller — however not insignificant — quantity of methane can also be emitted immediately from the cows’ feces throughout decomposition.

Researchers have been actively searching for options to the gut-produced methane. Including only a pinch — 0.5 p.c of the dry feed — of the purple algae Asparagopsis taxiformis to the cows’ meals can forestall about 65 p.c of that methane manufacturing.

Ubiquitous in tropical ocean waters, A. taxiformis comprises an natural compound known as bromoform, which inactivates an enzyme that usually helps the methane response alongside. This analysis has raised issues that the milk of dairy cows fed the algae might comprise poisonous ranges of bromoform in addition to iodine of their milk and meat. The U.S. Environmental Safety Company has assessed bromoform as a possible human carcinogen, and an excessive amount of iodine may cause thyroid malfunction.

An underwater photo of red algae.
The purple algae species Asparagopsis taxiformis (pictured) produces an natural compound that interferes with bacterial methane manufacturing, together with in cows’ guts and feces.Jean-Pascal Quod/Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 3.0)

Mohammad Ramin, an animal scientist on the Swedish College of Agricultural Sciences in Umeå, and colleagues puzzled whether or not it is likely to be attainable to chop out the intermediary — by including the algae on to the cows’ poop. That wouldn’t scale back the gut-produced methane, but it surely would possibly scale back general cattle emissions with out impacting meat or milk.

Methane emitted from feces is primarily an issue relating to dairy cows, says Sara Place, an animal scientist at Colorado State College in Fort Collins who was not concerned within the research. Dairy cows are usually raised in environments with extra oxygen-poor soils, and methane-producing micro organism thrive in such anaerobic environments. Cows raised for beef are inclined to dwell out their lives and defecate in open pasturelands or in an enclosed, however dry, feedlot, which is much less conducive floor for methane manufacturing.

Within the new research, Ramin and colleagues added algae to 4 dairy cows’ feces. Two had been fed the algae, and two hadn’t. Every fecal pattern was divided additional, with one subsample given further algae and the opposite left alone. Then, all of the fecal samples have been allowed to incubate, slowly decomposing within the laboratory. After 9 weeks, the group analyzed the subsamples to see how a lot methane they contained.

As anticipated, including algae to the cows’ meals did initially scale back methane of their poop. However as soon as the poop started to decompose, the manufacturing of recent methane wasn’t affected by whether or not the cows had eaten the algae or not. The group additionally examined the microbial communities dwelling within the various kinds of poop, they usually discovered that there wasn’t a lot distinction between the algae-fed cows and the management cows. That implies that algae meals dietary supplements aren’t that efficient at inhibiting methane manufacturing outdoors the abdomen.

However including the algae on to the feces did make a noticeable distinction to methane coming from decomposition. That, the group says, means that this may be an efficient a part of the answer to the bigger cow-methane downside.

The main energy of this new work is that it focuses on offering an answer to an understudied a part of the cow-methane downside, says Christopher Glasson, a chemist on the College of Waikato in Tauranga, New Zealand, who research agrichemicals derived from seaweed. However in the end, he says, it could simply not be cost-effective to provide A. taxiformis for this specific objective. “I feel [this strategy] is more likely to be nonviable resulting from the price of the manufacturing of the seaweed.”

A. taxiformis should still be handiest at suppressing fermentation in a cow’s guts quite than in its manure. The excellent news, Glasson says, is that state-of-the-art feed additive applied sciences that use particular extracts from the algae quite than the entire biomass significantly mitigate the chance of iodine or bromoform toxicity.

And the research’s conclusion that algae within the cows’ feed doesn’t have an effect on methane manufacturing of their feces may also be excellent news, in a approach, Place says. One proposed avenue for mitigating emissions from cow feces is to harness the methane to make biogas. “If you happen to feed [algae] to cattle for methane mitigation [and] should you don’t see any outcomes [in the manure], that might be good for biogas manufacturing,” she provides — a attainable two-fer for the business. 

Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles